Mac library or mobile document AI?

LocalRAG is a private document AI for iPhone, iPad and Android. PaperMind is a Mac-native library. The relevant choice is device fit: sustained desk research and large local folders on one side, capture and access from a phone or tablet on the other.

The short version

The argument isn't a universal winner. It's device fit. PaperMind addresses a desktop library; LocalRAG addresses mobile capture and access.

Pick PaperMind if your documents matter and your real work happens at a desk.

Pick LocalRAG if your document life genuinely is mobile-first — light reading, the occasional scan, audio capture in the field — and that's the whole job.

Where the device changes the workflow

This comparison is about form factor, not dismissing mobile work. A Mac is usually better suited to large folders, long documents, precise queries, and side-by-side review. A phone or tablet is better for capture, field access, and questions away from the desk.

Storage

Phones ship with 128 to 512 GB, and most of that is already photos, video, apps, and OS. A serious document library is tens to hundreds of GB. It physically doesn't fit. Real archives live on a Mac with an external drive or a NAS.

Source of truth

Even the files you see on your phone are usually iCloud Drive copies of files that actually live on a Mac. The phone is a window onto the library. If you're going to index the library, you index it on the machine that holds the originals.

Ergonomics

Reading a 200-page PDF on glass is painful. Typing a precise question on a phone keyboard is slow. Holding two documents side-by-side is impossible. Document work is screen-real-estate work. A 27-inch display does in three seconds what a phone can't do.

Mobile-first document AI is great for the moment you remember a fact in line at a coffee shop. It's the wrong shape for the work itself.

What LocalRAG actually does well

None of the above means LocalRAG is a bad product. It's a real, working, well-engineered private document AI for the device most of us also have on us all the time. Where it's the right answer:

You record meetings or lectures.

This is the thing LocalRAG does that PaperMind doesn't, at all. WhisperKit on iOS, whisper.cpp on Android, transcript ready to chat with. If audio is your load-bearing input, LocalRAG is the right tool and nothing on our end changes that.

You scan receipts, business cards, single pages.

You have a phone in your pocket and a moment to capture something. OCR runs on-device, gets dropped into a small library. Nothing in PaperMind helps you here, because PaperMind isn't in your pocket.

You read on a train or in a waiting room.

Pulling up a 30-page document on the iPad to ask a question while you wait is real value. The alternative is doomscrolling.

You don't own a Mac.

This is the simplest case. If your daily driver is an iPad or an Android tablet, LocalRAG is your option. PaperMind doesn't ship there.

Feature-by-feature

Source checked : LocalRAG's official product page and support and plan details. PaperMind is still in release validation. Spot something wrong and tell us.

Capability PaperMind LocalRAG
Where it runsmacOS 14+, where document libraries actually liveiPhone, iPad, Android — satellite devices
Practical library sizeMac storage and memory; no universal size promiseMobile storage and memory
Screen for the jobFull Mac display. Side-by-side. Real PDF viewing.6–13" touchscreen, single task at a time
Typing the questionReal keyboard, long precise queriesGlass typing or voice; short queries
PricingRepository plan: free core + $29.99 one-time unlock; not yet a live offerSee LocalRAG's current listing
Account neededNoOptional
File formats it reads30+ extensions across PDFs, Office files, EPUB, images, text, HTML, structured data23 formats including audio and video
Audio & videoNot supported. Documents only.MP3, M4A, WAV, AAC, FLAC, MP4, MOV via WhisperKit / whisper.cpp
OCR for scansApple Vision via ocrmac — same engine the rest of macOS usesOn-device OCR
Local LLM choicesLlama 3.1 8B, Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct, more — GGUF and MLXQwen3 4B
Cloud LLM optionBring your key for Claude, OpenAI, OpenRouterBundled Claude routing plus BYOK
Embedding modelIBM Granite 97m multilingual default, plus BGE-Small / Base / M3E5 Multilingual
SearchHybrid BM25 + semantic + knowledge-graph global modeBM25 + semantic, cross-language
CitationsPage-level, click to jump in the PDFInline citations, PDF jump
WorkspacesMultiple, fully isolatedCollections (folders)
OfflineYesYes (on-device AI mode)

Where each one wins

PaperMind wins for

The real work.

The library that's actually on your hard drive. The contract that needs to be read against its previous version. The 11 GB of scanned genealogy records. The research folder with 800 PDFs. Anything where you sit down, focus, and don't want to be typing queries on a phone keyboard. One-time price, multi-GB libraries, knowledge-graph queries across the whole corpus.

LocalRAG wins for

The work that's actually mobile.

The lecture you just recorded. The receipt you need to scan. The PDF a colleague just sent that you want to skim on the train. The audio of a doctor's visit. If you don't sit at a Mac for this kind of work, LocalRAG is the right answer.

Running both is fine

Plenty of people will. PaperMind on the Mac as the primary workspace. LocalRAG on the phone for the on-the-go bits. That's a coherent setup and we're not going to pretend otherwise. The asymmetry is the point: the Mac side does the heavy lifting, the phone side handles the edges. If you had to pick one for serious document work, it'd be the Mac, and we built for the Mac.

A note on price

PaperMind's Full Unlock is documented as a one-time $29.99 purchase. LocalRAG's live plans and bundled services can change. Compare the current total and limits at the time you choose.

Common questions

Is LocalRAG on Mac?
It isn't. iPhone, iPad and Android only. If your library is on a Mac, PaperMind is the native pick.
Is PaperMind on iPhone?
It isn't, and we built it that way deliberately. Document workspaces belong on the device where the documents are.
Why does desktop matter so much for this?
Storage (phones can't hold a serious library), source of truth (originals live on Macs), and ergonomics (PDFs and detailed queries need a real screen and keyboard).
What about cost long term?
Compare PaperMind's one-time unlock with LocalRAG's current live plan; avoid projections based on old prices.
I record a lot of audio. Then what?
LocalRAG transcribes audio; PaperMind doesn't. If audio is the load-bearing input, LocalRAG is the right tool. Or: transcribe with anything (Whisper, a Mac app, even LocalRAG itself), drop the transcript text file into PaperMind, and do the deep analysis there.
Is one more private?
Both are local-first. Pick by where your library lives, not by privacy claim.

Document work belongs at the desk.

That's where PaperMind lives. Its repository documents a free core and one-time unlock for macOS 14+, but the public offer is still being validated.

Check release status Back to product page